A note on this column: This article is general medical information, not a description of a service offered at this practice. Dr. Ishiguro's surgical practice is focused on hip and knee conditions — he does not treat clavicle fractures or perform shoulder or collarbone surgery. This column is written to help readers understand a common injury and know when and how to seek the right specialist, typically an orthopaedic trauma or shoulder surgeon.
What the clavicle does
The clavicle (collarbone) is the S-shaped bone that runs across the top of the chest, from the breastbone (sternum) to the tip of the shoulder blade (the acromion). It is the only bony connection between the arm and the trunk, acting as a strut that holds the shoulder out to the side and lets the arm move freely. Because it sits just under the skin, it is easy to feel — and when it breaks, the deformity is often visible. In Japanese the injury is called sakotsu kossetsu (鎖骨骨折).
Fractures are usually described by location. The middle third (midshaft) is by far the most common site; fractures of the outer (lateral) end near the shoulder are less common, and fractures of the inner (medial) end near the breastbone are rare. Doctors also note whether the broken ends have shifted out of contact (displaced), whether the bone has shortened, and whether it is broken into several pieces (comminuted).
Key points
- Clavicle fractures are common, and about four in five involve the middle third of the bone
- The usual cause is a fall onto the side of the shoulder — cycling, contact sports, skiing and snowboarding, or road accidents
- Undisplaced fractures almost always heal in a simple sling
- For displaced midshaft fractures, plate fixation lowers the risk of non-healing, but long-term function is similar on average to sling treatment
- Surgery has its own trade-offs: wound problems, prominent hardware and a second operation to remove the plate are not unusual
- Most children and adolescents heal well without surgery
Who gets it and how
In an 11-year study of 535 clavicle fractures treated at a large hospital in Rome, the clavicle accounted for 2.6% of all fractures and 44% of fractures around the shoulder girdle. Most patients (68%) were male, 81% of fractures were in the middle third and only 2% in the medial third, and traffic accidents were the most common cause. Midshaft fractures were especially dominant in childhood, when more than half were undisplaced (Postacchini et al., Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2002).
The typical mechanism is a direct blow or fall onto the side of the shoulder, which compresses the clavicle along its length until it buckles. A fall onto an outstretched hand can do the same. In Tokyo, bicycle and e-scooter falls, rugby, football, judo, mountain biking, and winter sports trips are familiar scenarios.
Symptoms and warning signs
Typical symptoms are sudden pain over the collarbone, swelling and bruising, a visible or palpable bump, a grinding sensation on moving, and difficulty lifting the arm. People often support the injured arm against the body with the other hand, and the shoulder may look lower or rounded forward.
Most clavicle fractures are isolated injuries, but some features need prompt emergency assessment:
Seek urgent care if
- A bone fragment is pressing hard against the skin (skin "tenting"), or the bone has broken through the skin
- There is numbness, tingling, weakness, coldness or colour change in the arm or hand
- There is shortness of breath or chest pain — particularly after a high-energy injury such as a road accident
- The injury happened in a crash or fall from height, where other injuries (ribs, shoulder blade, head) may also be present
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is usually straightforward: an examination followed by X-rays of the clavicle, often including an angled view to judge displacement and shortening. A CT scan may be used for fractures near either end of the bone, where the joints are hard to see on plain X-rays, or when the injury pattern is complex. Fractures of the inner end and injuries to the joint between the clavicle and breastbone in particular are often assessed with CT, because important blood vessels and the windpipe lie just behind this area.
Treatment options
The choice depends on the location of the fracture, how far the ends have moved, the person's age and activity demands, other injuries, and personal preference. Below is a simplified overview — individual decisions are made with the treating surgeon.
| Fracture type | Usual first approach | When surgery is considered |
|---|---|---|
| Undisplaced midshaft | Sling for comfort, early gentle movement | Rarely |
| Displaced midshaft | Sling, or plate/intramedullary fixation after shared decision-making | Marked displacement or shortening, threatened skin, open fracture, multiple injuries, high-demand patients, or non-healing |
| Outer (lateral) end | Sling if ligaments holding the clavicle down are intact | When the main fragment is pulled upward because the stabilising ligaments are torn |
| Inner (medial) end | Usually sling | Uncommon; mainly when displaced fragments threaten structures behind the breastbone |
Non-operative treatment
Non-operative care means a sling for comfort, pain relief, and gradual return of shoulder movement as pain allows. The fracture usually feels much more comfortable within a few weeks, though full bony healing takes longer. A bump at the fracture site is normal as healing bone (callus) forms, and in displaced fractures some permanent prominence or shortening often remains.
The traditional figure-of-eight bandage, which pulls the shoulders back, is still sometimes used. Evidence comparing it with a sling is limited.
What the evidence shows: In a randomised trial of 79 outpatients with midshaft clavicle fractures (61 completing follow-up), treatment with a simple sling caused less discomfort than a figure-of-eight bandage, with identical functional and cosmetic results at three months; alignment of the healed fractures was unchanged from the initial displacement in both groups (Andersen et al., Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1987).
Surgical fixation
The most common operation for a displaced midshaft fracture is open reduction and plate fixation — the fragments are realigned through an incision and held with a contoured metal plate and screws. An alternative is an intramedullary device (a rod or pin inside the bone). Outer-end fractures with torn ligaments are fixed with specialised plates or devices that hold the clavicle down to the shoulder blade.
For many years almost all midshaft fractures were treated in a sling, based on older reports of very low non-healing rates. Later studies of displaced fractures in adults found higher rates of non-healing and dissatisfaction than expected, which prompted randomised trials.
What the evidence shows: In a multicentre Canadian trial, 132 adults with completely displaced midshaft fractures were randomised to plate fixation or a sling. Among those followed for a year, non-union occurred in 2 operated patients versus 7 in the sling group, and symptomatic malunion in none versus 9. Average time to union was 16.4 versus 28.4 weeks, and shoulder scores favoured surgery. Most complications after surgery were hardware-related, and plate removal was the most common reason for a further operation (Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 2007).
Later pooled analyses have put these results in perspective. Surgery consistently lowers the chance of non-healing, but the average gain in long-term shoulder function is small, and secondary operations are common in both groups — for symptomatic non-union after sling treatment, and for plate removal or wound problems after surgery.
What the evidence shows: A meta-analysis of six randomised trials (614 patients) found that plate fixation cut the risk of non-union substantially (relative risk 0.14), but function scores at one year differed by only about 4–5 points — not judged clinically relevant. When plate removal was counted, about 17% of patients in each group had a second operation. The authors concluded that there was not enough evidence to support routine surgery for every displaced midshaft fracture (Woltz et al., Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 2017).
What the evidence shows: A Cochrane review of 14 trials (1,469 adults) found low-quality evidence that surgery does not meaningfully improve function, pain or quality of life at one year or more, but may reduce "treatment failure" — mainly symptomatic non-union, which occurred in 11.6% of conservatively treated patients. On the other side of the ledger, 10.2% of surgical patients had hardware removed because of discomfort and 3.2% had infection, while symptomatic malunion was more common after conservative treatment (11.3% vs 1.2%). The reviewers recommended choosing treatment individually, after weighing benefits, harms and patient preferences (Lenza et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019).
| Displaced midshaft | Sling | Plate fixation |
|---|---|---|
| Risk of non-healing | Higher | Lower |
| Early return of function | Slower on average | Often quicker |
| Function at 1 year+ | Similar on average; small differences of uncertain importance | |
| Main downsides | Symptomatic non-union or malunion; visible bump | Operative risks, infection, scar numbness, prominent plate, possible removal surgery |
In practice, factors that push the discussion toward surgery include large displacement or shortening, multiple fragments, skin at risk, open fractures, several injuries at once, and patients who need the fastest possible return to heavy work or sport. Smoking and older age are often cited as risk factors for slow healing. Many people with displaced fractures still reasonably choose a sling, knowing that surgery remains an option if the bone does not heal.
Children and adolescents
Clavicle fractures are very common in childhood, and young bones heal quickly and remodel well. Even displaced fractures in adolescents are usually treated without surgery.
What the evidence shows: A 2025 meta-analysis of seven comparative studies (578 adolescents) with displaced midshaft fractures found no significant difference in arm function between surgical and non-operative treatment, while non-operative care was associated with fewer complications and fewer revision surgeries (Galán-Olleros et al., International Orthopaedics, 2025). The included studies were non-randomised, so the evidence is not definitive.
Recovery
Recovery timelines vary with age, fracture pattern and treatment, but some general principles apply. Gentle elbow, wrist and hand movement can usually start immediately. Shoulder motion is increased gradually as pain allows, often guided by a physiotherapist. Heavy lifting and strengthening usually wait until X-rays show healing. Contact sports and activities with a risk of falls — rugby, judo, mountain biking — are typically resumed only after the treating doctor confirms solid union, because re-fracture through incompletely healed bone can occur. Driving a car or riding a bicycle should wait until you can control the vehicle safely and react to an emergency.
Persistent pain, clicking or movement at the fracture site several months after injury can be a sign of non-union and is worth reviewing with a surgeon, as it can often be treated successfully.
When to see a doctor
Any suspected collarbone fracture should be examined and X-rayed. Go to an emergency department immediately if the skin is broken or tightly tented, the arm is numb or weak, or you have breathing difficulty. Otherwise, an orthopaedic clinic (整形外科) can usually make the diagnosis on the same day; for displaced fractures, ask whether a review with an orthopaedic trauma or shoulder surgeon would help you weigh the options. Bring any previous X-ray images or reports if you have been seen elsewhere first.
References (PubMed / Journal)
Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F. Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):452-456. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.126613
Andersen K, Jensen PO, Lauritzen J. Treatment of clavicular fractures. Figure-of-eight bandage versus a simple sling. Acta Orthop Scand. 1987;58(1):71-74. DOI: 10.3109/17453678709146346
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):1-10. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00020
Woltz S, Krijnen P, Schipper IB. Plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(12):1051-1057. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01068
Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Ferrari BA, Faloppa F. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):CD009363. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009363.pub3
Galán-Olleros M, Stitzman-Wengrowicz ML, Martínez-Álvarez S, et al. Nonoperative versus surgical treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int Orthop. 2025;49(9):2227-2238. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-025-06589-y