A note on this column: This article is general medical information, not a description of a service offered at this practice. Dr. Ishiguro's surgical practice is focused on hip and knee conditions — he does not treat scaphoid fractures or perform wrist or hand surgery. This column is written to help readers understand a commonly missed wrist injury and know when and how to seek the right specialist, typically a hand surgeon or an orthopaedic trauma team.

What the scaphoid is

The wrist contains eight small carpal bones arranged in two rows. The scaphoid — named from the Greek for "boat" because of its curved shape — sits on the thumb side and bridges both rows, linking the forearm bone (radius) to the bones at the base of the hand. That bridging position makes it essential to normal wrist movement, and also makes it the carpal bone most likely to break: scaphoid fractures account for around 90% of all carpal fractures (Dias et al., Lancet, 2020). In Japanese it is called shūjōkotsu kossetsu (舟状骨骨折).

Two features make the scaphoid unusual. First, much of its surface is covered in joint cartilage, leaving limited room for blood vessels to enter. Second, its main blood supply enters toward the end nearest the thumb and flows backward to the end nearest the forearm (the proximal pole). A fracture across the bone can therefore cut off blood flow to the proximal fragment, which is one reason these fractures can be slow to heal, fail to heal (nonunion), or lead to loss of blood supply to part of the bone (avascular necrosis).

Key points

Who gets it and how

The classic mechanism is a fall onto an outstretched hand with the wrist bent backward. In a population study from Edinburgh, the annual incidence of confirmed scaphoid fractures was 29 per 100,000 adults; about 70% occurred in men, who were also significantly younger than the women affected. Simple falls from standing height were the most common cause, while men were more likely to be injured in higher-energy events such as sport or road accidents (Duckworth et al., Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2012). In Tokyo, cycling falls, skiing and snowboarding trips, ball sports and slips on wet stairs are familiar scenarios.

Fractures are described by location — the distal pole (nearest the thumb), the waist (the middle, and the most common site), and the proximal pole — and by whether the fragments have shifted (displaced) or remain aligned. Location and displacement are the two features that most influence treatment.

Symptoms

Typical symptoms are pain and swelling on the thumb side of the wrist, pain when gripping or pinching, and pain on moving the wrist or thumb. Many people can still move the wrist reasonably well, and visible deformity is unusual, which is why a scaphoid fracture is easily dismissed as a sprain. A doctor will usually press over the anatomical snuffbox (the small hollow at the base of the thumb when it is extended), over the bony prominence on the palm side of the wrist, and push along the thumb toward the wrist; tenderness at these points raises suspicion. None of these signs is definitive on its own, but together with the history they guide imaging.

Why diagnosis can be difficult

Standard wrist X-rays, including special scaphoid views, are the first test. The problem is that a fresh, undisplaced crack may not be visible for days or even weeks. At the same time, most people with a suspected scaphoid fracture do not actually have one. Doctors must balance two risks: missing a real fracture, which may then heal poorly, and immobilising many uninjured wrists "just in case".

What the evidence shows: In a year-long prospective series from an Edinburgh fracture clinic, 537 patients were referred with a possible scaphoid injury. Only 130 had a confirmed fracture, and 43 of those (33%) were occult fractures not visible on the initial X-rays; 76% of referred patients were never shown to have a fracture, and many were immobilised unnecessarily (Burns et al., Scottish Medical Journal, 2013).

Traditionally, a suspected fracture with normal X-rays was treated in a splint or cast with repeat X-rays after 10–14 days. Increasingly, advanced imaging is used earlier to reach a definite answer sooner.

TestWhat it showsLimitations
X-rayVisible fractures, displacement, alignment of the carpal bonesCan miss fresh undisplaced fractures
MRIBone bruising and fracture lines not seen on X-ray; soft-tissue and ligament injuryAvailability, cost and scan time; some false positives
CTFine bony detail — displacement, fracture pattern, and later whether the bone has healedLess sensitive than MRI for subtle fresh fractures; radiation dose
Bone scanIncreased bone activity at a fracture siteUsually needs 72 hours after injury; less specific; radiation; now used less often

What the evidence shows: A Cochrane review of 11 studies in patients with suspected scaphoid fractures and normal X-rays estimated sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 99% for CT, 88% and 100% for MRI, and 99% and 86% for bone scintigraphy. Because true fractures made up only about a fifth of suspected cases, the authors noted that the lower specificity of bone scanning would lead to more over-treatment, whereas CT and MRI would over-treat far fewer patients (Mallee et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015). Confidence intervals were wide, and no single test is perfect.

Even MRI has limits when the chance of a true fracture is low: a review noted that false-positive scans occur and that the best strategy may combine imaging with clinical prediction rules based on the patient's age, sex, mechanism of injury and examination findings (Duckworth et al., Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, 2011). In Japan, MRI and CT are widely available, and early cross-sectional imaging is commonly used when the clinical picture is suggestive.

Treatment options

Treatment depends mainly on where the fracture is, whether it is displaced, how long ago it happened, and the person's work and activity demands.

Cast or splint immobilisation

Most undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures of the distal pole and waist are treated in a below-elbow cast. Distal pole fractures usually heal relatively quickly; waist fractures commonly need several weeks of immobilisation, with healing checked by X-ray or CT before the cast is removed. Whether the thumb needs to be included in the cast has been debated.

What the evidence shows: In a multicentre randomised trial of 62 patients with CT- or MRI-confirmed undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures, a below-elbow cast that left the thumb free produced at least as much healing on CT at 10 weeks (85% vs 70% of the fracture line bridged) as one that included the thumb, with no differences in motion, grip strength, function or pain. The overall union rate was 98% (Buijze et al., Journal of Hand Surgery American Volume, 2014).

Surgical fixation

Surgery usually involves passing a small compression screw across the fracture, often through a short incision or percutaneously (through the skin) under X-ray guidance. It is generally recommended for displaced fractures, many proximal pole fractures (which have a higher risk of not healing), fractures associated with other wrist injuries, and established nonunions. For undisplaced waist fractures, early surgery was once promoted as a way to return to work and sport faster, and its use grew — which led to a large trial to test it.

SWIFFT resultEarly surgeryCast first
Wrist score (PRWE) at 1 year*11.914.0 (no significant difference)
Potentially serious surgical complications14%1%
Cast-related complications2%18%
Nonunion on imaging at 5 years2.1%3.3%

*Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, 0–100; lower scores mean less pain and disability.

What the evidence shows: The SWIFFT trial randomised 439 adults (mean age 33; 83% men) at 31 UK hospitals with scaphoid waist fractures displaced by 2 mm or less to early screw fixation, or to a cast with prompt surgery only if the fracture failed to heal. There was no significant difference in patient-rated wrist pain and function at one year; surgery avoided cast problems but carried more surgical complications (Dias et al., Lancet, 2020). At five years, results remained similar between the groups, including grip strength and range of motion (Dias et al., Bone & Joint Journal, 2026). The authors concluded that such fractures should initially be treated in a cast, with early fixation of confirmed nonunions.

These findings apply to waist fractures with little or no displacement. Treatment of displaced fractures, proximal pole fractures and injuries in elite athletes or people with special occupational demands is more individualised, and the trade-offs — time in a cast versus the risks of an operation — are worth discussing openly with a hand surgeon.

When things don't heal

Timely immobilisation matters. In a Danish series of 285 scaphoid fractures, a delay of less than four weeks before immobilisation did not increase healing problems, but when the delay exceeded four weeks, most fractures had healing complications (Langhoff and Andersen, Journal of Hand Surgery British Volume, 1988). An untreated nonunion is not always painful at first, but over years it can change the mechanics of the wrist. In a classic study of 47 symptomatic nonunions followed for between 5 and 53 years, degenerative changes progressed from changes confined to the scaphoid to arthritis between the scaphoid and radius and, eventually, more generalised wrist arthritis; few nonunions remained free of arthritis after ten years (Mack et al., Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 1984). This pattern is sometimes called scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC).

Nonunions are usually treated surgically, often with bone grafting and screw fixation; later-stage arthritis may require salvage procedures. Outcomes are generally better when nonunion is recognised early, which is why follow-up imaging until the bone has clearly healed is an important part of care.

Recovery

After the cast comes off or surgery heals, stiffness and weakness are common and usually improve with a graded programme of range-of-motion and grip-strengthening exercises, sometimes guided by a hand therapist. Return to desk work can often be early; heavy manual work, contact sports and activities that load the wrist in extension (push-ups, gymnastics, yoga weight-bearing poses) generally wait until healing is confirmed. Smoking is widely regarded as a risk factor for poor bone healing, and stopping is advisable.

When to see a doctor

After a fall onto the hand, wrist pain on the thumb side that persists beyond a day or two — particularly with tenderness at the base of the thumb or pain on gripping — is worth having examined, even if you can still move the wrist. If the first X-ray is normal but pain continues, ask about follow-up imaging rather than assuming it is a sprain. An old wrist injury that "never quite settled", with ongoing ache or reduced movement, can also be a reason to check for an unhealed scaphoid. In Tokyo, an orthopaedic hand surgery clinic (手外科) is usually the most appropriate first contact; many general orthopaedic clinics can perform the initial X-rays and refer on if needed.

References (PubMed / Journal)

Dias JJ, Brealey SD, Fairhurst C, et al. Surgery versus cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist (SWIFFT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10248):390-401. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30931-4

Dias JJ, Brealey SD, Coleman E, et al. Clinical effectiveness of early surgical fixation versus cast immobilization for adults with a scaphoid waist fracture: five-year follow-up of the Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial. Bone Joint J. 2026;108-B(1):70-78. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.108B1.BJJ-2025-0122.R1

Duckworth AD, Jenkins PJ, Aitken SA, Clement ND, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Scaphoid fracture epidemiology. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(2):E41-E45. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822458e8

Burns MJ, Aitken SA, McRae D, Duckworth AD, Gray A. The suspected scaphoid injury: resource implications in the absence of magnetic resonance imaging. Scott Med J. 2013;58(3):143-148. DOI: 10.1177/0036933013496950

Mallee WH, Wang J, Poolman RW, et al. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(6):CD010023. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010023.pub2

Duckworth AD, Ring D, McQueen MM. Assessment of the suspected fracture of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(6):713-719. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B6.26506

Buijze GA, Goslings JC, Rhemrev SJ, et al. Cast immobilization with and without immobilization of the thumb for nondisplaced and minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(4):621-627. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.12.039

Langhoff O, Andersen JL. Consequences of late immobilization of scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 1988;13(1):77-79. DOI: 10.1016/0266-7681_88_90058-7

Mack GR, Bosse MJ, Gelberman RH, Yu E. The natural history of scaphoid non-union. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(4):504-509. PubMed: 6707028