A note on this column: This article is general medical information, not a description of a service offered at this practice. Dr. Ishiguro's surgical practice is focused on hip and knee conditions — he does not treat vertebral compression fractures or perform spine procedures such as vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. This column is written to help readers and their families understand a common cause of back pain in older adults and know when and how to seek the right specialist, typically a spine surgeon or an osteoporosis-focused physician.
What a vertebral compression fracture is
The spine is built from stacked, roughly cylindrical bones called vertebral bodies. In healthy bone they easily carry the weight of the upper body. When bone has been thinned by osteoporosis, a vertebral body can collapse under everyday loads — bending forward, lifting, a minor fall, sometimes with no remembered event at all. The front of the vertebra usually collapses more than the back, leaving it wedge-shaped. In Japan this is commonly called kotsusoshōshō-sei tsuitai kossetsu (骨粗鬆症性椎体骨折), or simply assaku kossetsu (圧迫骨折).
Most fractures occur around the junction of the thoracic and lumbar spine — roughly the level of the lower ribs to the upper waist — where the relatively rigid chest meets the more mobile lower back. They are most common in post-menopausal women, but men are affected too, as are people taking long-term steroid medication. Vertebral fractures can also result from high-energy trauma or, less commonly, from tumours weakening the bone; this column focuses on the osteoporotic type.
Key points
- An osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is a collapse of a spinal bone weakened by low bone density, often after minor or no trauma
- Many cause sudden back pain, but a substantial number cause few symptoms and are found incidentally on X-ray
- MRI helps distinguish a new fracture from an old one and can flag fractures at higher risk of not healing
- Most fractures are managed without surgery; pain usually improves substantially over the first three months
- Sham-controlled trials have not shown a clear benefit of vertebroplasty for most patients; its role remains debated
- A first vertebral fracture sharply raises the risk of another, so osteoporosis assessment and treatment are central to care
How common they are
Vertebral fractures are often described as the hallmark fracture of osteoporosis. In a population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 83% of newly diagnosed vertebral fractures followed moderate or no trauma, and the incidence in women was almost twice that in men, rising steeply with age (Cooper et al., Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1992). Because many fractures cause only mild or vague symptoms, the number seen in clinics is generally thought to underestimate how many actually occur. With one of the world's oldest populations, Japan has a particular interest in these fractures, and Japanese spine groups have produced much of the recent research on how they heal.
Symptoms
The classic presentation is sudden back pain in an older adult, often after a trivial event, that is worst when moving — getting out of bed, turning over, standing up from a chair — and eases somewhat when lying still. The pain is usually felt at the level of the fracture and may wrap around the side of the chest or abdomen like a band. Over time, one or more fractures can lead to loss of height and a more stooped, rounded upper back (kyphosis), which can in turn affect breathing, appetite and balance.
Not every fracture announces itself. Some people have only a dull ache, and some notice nothing until a chest X-ray or CT taken for another reason shows a collapsed vertebra. Leg weakness, numbness or difficulty controlling the bladder or bowel are not typical and suggest the fracture may be pressing on the spinal cord or nerves — these need urgent assessment.
How it's diagnosed
Diagnosis combines the story, an examination (often tenderness when the spine is gently tapped), and imaging. Imaging has three jobs: confirming a fracture, judging whether it is new or old, and ruling out other causes.
| Test | What it shows | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| X-ray | Loss of vertebral height and wedge shape; standing and lying views can show whether the vertebra moves or collapses further | A fresh fracture may look normal at first; hard to tell new from old |
| MRI | Bone-marrow oedema marking a recent fracture; signal patterns associated with delayed healing; nerve or cord involvement | Not suitable for everyone (some implants); longer scan time |
| CT | Fine bony detail — useful when fracture fragments may extend toward the spinal canal | Radiation exposure; less useful for judging fracture age |
| Bone density (DXA) | Confirms and quantifies osteoporosis to guide medication | Does not show the fracture itself |
Blood tests are often used to check calcium, vitamin D and kidney function, and to look for less common causes of fragile bone. When features are unusual — a fracture high in the thoracic spine, no history suggestive of osteoporosis, unexplained weight loss — doctors will also consider whether a tumour might be responsible.
What the evidence shows: In a Japanese prospective study of 350 patients with fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated without surgery at 25 institutions, 13.5% had not healed (nonunion) at six months. Fractures at the thoracolumbar junction, involvement of the middle part of the vertebra, and particular MRI signal patterns at the first visit were associated with a higher risk of nonunion (Tsujio et al., Spine, 2011). Findings like these are one reason MRI is commonly used early in Japan.
Treatment options
Treatment has two separate goals: managing the current fracture — pain relief and maintaining mobility while the bone heals — and preventing the next one. The second is just as important as the first and is easily overlooked.
Non-surgical care
The great majority of osteoporotic vertebral fractures are treated without surgery. Typical elements include pain medication, a short period of reduced activity followed by early, gradual mobilisation (prolonged bed rest carries its own risks in older adults, including muscle loss and blood clots), and often a brace or corset for several weeks. Physiotherapy focusing on posture, back-extensor strength and balance is commonly added once the acute pain settles.
What the evidence shows: A Japanese nationwide randomised trial assigned 284 women aged 65–85 with a fresh single-level fracture to either a rigid brace or a soft brace for 12 weeks. At 48 weeks there was no significant difference between the groups in vertebral collapse, back pain or quality of life (Kato et al., Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2019). In a longer-term follow-up of participants, pain and quality of life improved mainly during the first 12 weeks and changed little afterwards over an average of 5.3 years; about a quarter still had some low back pain at final follow-up, more often in older patients and those with a previous vertebral fracture (Inose et al., Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021).
Vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty
In vertebroplasty, bone cement is injected through a needle into the fractured vertebra to stabilise it. Balloon kyphoplasty first inflates a small balloon inside the vertebra to create a cavity and partly restore height, then fills it with cement. Both are performed through small punctures in the back. They became widely used on the basis of rapid pain relief seen in early studies — but the evidence has proved more complicated than first appeared.
| Trial | Comparison | Main finding |
|---|---|---|
| Buchbinder 2009 | Vertebroplasty vs sham (78 patients) | No significant advantage at any time point up to 6 months; both groups improved |
| FREE 2009 | Balloon kyphoplasty vs non-surgical care (300 patients) | Greater improvement in physical function at 1 month in the kyphoplasty group; not blinded |
| VERTOS II 2010 | Vertebroplasty vs conservative care (202 patients) | Greater pain reduction at 1 month and 1 year; not blinded |
| VAPOUR 2016 | Vertebroplasty vs sham, fractures under 6 weeks old (120 patients) | More patients had low pain at 14 days with vertebroplasty (44% vs 21%) |
| VERTOS IV 2018 | Vertebroplasty vs sham (180 patients) | No significant difference in pain relief over 12 months |
The pattern that emerges is that trials comparing cement procedures with usual care — where patients know which treatment they received — tend to show benefit, while most trials using a sham (simulated) procedure show both groups improving to a similar degree. The VAPOUR trial, which enrolled patients with very recent fractures, many of them in hospital, is the main sham-controlled exception.
What the evidence shows: A 2018 Cochrane review of 21 trials concluded that high- to moderate-quality evidence shows no important benefit of vertebroplasty over a sham procedure for pain, disability or quality of life in acute or subacute osteoporotic fractures in routine practice, and that open trials against usual care are likely to have overestimated benefit. The authors also noted that serious adverse events have been reported, although numbers were too small to be certain about the risk of new fractures (Buchbinder et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018).
Professional guidance on these procedures differs between countries, and specialists continue to debate whether particular groups — for example, people with severe pain that is not improving, or fractures at high risk of nonunion — may benefit. Balloon kyphoplasty is available under Japan's national health insurance for painful osteoporotic fractures that have not responded adequately to conservative treatment. For anyone considering a cement procedure, the most useful conversation with a spine specialist covers how long the pain has lasted, how it is affecting daily life, what the imaging shows, and the evidence for and against the procedure in their particular situation.
Surgery for complicated fractures
Open surgery — usually stabilisation with screws and rods, sometimes combined with decompression of the nerves — is reserved for a small minority: fractures that compress the spinal cord or nerves, progressive collapse causing severe deformity, or painful nonunion that does not respond to other measures. These are major operations in an older population, and the decision is individualised.
Preventing the next fracture
A vertebral compression fracture is not only a painful injury; it is strong evidence that the skeleton as a whole is fragile. The risk of a further fracture is highest in the months that follow.
What the evidence shows: Among post-menopausal women in the placebo groups of large osteoporosis trials, 19.2% of those who sustained a new vertebral fracture had another within the following year (Lindsay et al., JAMA, 2001). In women with severe osteoporosis and existing vertebral fractures, the VERO trial found fewer new vertebral fractures over 24 months with teriparatide (a bone-building injection) than with risedronate (an oral bisphosphonate): 5.4% versus 12.0% (Kendler et al., Lancet, 2018).
After a vertebral fracture, a bone density scan and a discussion of osteoporosis medication are generally recommended. Options include bisphosphonates, denosumab, and bone-forming agents such as teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab; which is suitable depends on fracture history, bone density, kidney function and other health factors. Adequate calcium, vitamin D and protein, regular weight-bearing and balance exercise, stopping smoking, limiting alcohol and reducing fall hazards at home all play a part. For more on these measures, see the column on osteoporosis and bone health.
When to see a doctor
New back pain in an older adult — especially after a minor fall or lift, or in someone known to have osteoporosis or taking steroid medication — is worth having checked rather than assumed to be a strained muscle. Seek urgent attention for leg weakness or numbness, difficulty walking, changes in bladder or bowel control, fever, or unexplained weight loss. Unexplained height loss of a few centimetres or a newly rounded upper back are also good reasons to ask about a spine X-ray and bone density test. In Tokyo, an orthopaedic spine specialist, or an osteoporosis clinic for bone-health management, is usually the most appropriate first contact.
References (PubMed / Journal)
Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7(2):221-227. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070214
Tsujio T, Nakamura H, Terai H, et al. Characteristic radiographic or magnetic resonance images of fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures predicting potential risk for nonunion: a prospective multicenter study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(15):1229-1235. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f29e8d
Kato T, Inose H, Ichimura S, et al. Comparison of rigid and soft-brace treatments for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):198. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8020198
Inose H, Kato T, Shirasawa S, et al. Time course of acute vertebral fractures: a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5961. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10245961
Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, et al. A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(6):557-568. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900429
Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, et al. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9668):1016-1024. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60010-6
Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, et al. Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1085-1092. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60954-3
Clark W, Bird P, Gonski P, et al. Safety and efficacy of vertebroplasty for acute painful osteoporotic fractures (VAPOUR): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10052):1408-1416. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31341-1
Firanescu CE, de Vries J, Lodder P, et al. Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV): randomised sham controlled clinical trial. BMJ. 2018;361:k1551. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k1551
Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Rischin KJ, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;11(11):CD006349. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006349.pub4
Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001;285(3):320-323. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.3.320
Kendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, et al. Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10117):230-240. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2