A note on this column: This article is general medical information, not a description of a service offered at this practice. Dr. Ishiguro's surgical practice is focused on hip and knee conditions — he does not treat hamstring strains or other thigh muscle injuries. This column is written to help readers understand a very common sports injury and know when and how to seek the right specialist, typically a sports medicine physician, orthopaedic surgeon with a sports medicine focus, or physiotherapist.

What actually tears

The hamstrings are a group of three muscles running down the back of the thigh — the biceps femoris, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus — that work together to bend the knee and extend the hip, and that undergo enormous eccentric load (lengthening while contracting) during the late swing phase of sprinting, just before the foot strikes the ground. A "pulled hamstring" is a strain or partial tear of muscle fibers, most often at the junction between muscle and tendon, where the tissue is structurally weakest.

The biceps femoris is torn in the clear majority of cases — commonly cited at well over half of all hamstring strains — largely because of its particular anatomy and the way it's loaded during high-speed running. Sprinting-type injuries typically occur in this muscle, while a distinct second mechanism, a slower stretching-type injury seen in movements like the splits or a high kick, more often involves the semimembranosus and tends to take longer to recover from.

BAMIC GradeMRI findingsTypical severity
Grade 0Clinical symptoms, no abnormality on MRIMild, functional strain without structural disruption
Grade 1Edema <10% of cross-sectional area or <5cm lengthMinor
Grade 2Edema 10–50% of cross-sectional area or 5–15cm lengthModerate
Grade 3Edema >50% of cross-sectional area, >15cm length, or >5cm fiber disruptionSevere partial or complete tear
Grade 4Complete muscle tear with tendon retractionFull-thickness rupture

Each numbered grade also carries a letter suffix — "a" (myofascial), "b" (musculotendinous), or "c" (intratendinous) — describing exactly where within the muscle-tendon unit the injury sits, because injuries involving the central tendon itself tend to take substantially longer to heal than similarly sized injuries elsewhere in the muscle.

How common this is, and who it happens to

Hamstring strains are consistently among the most frequent injuries in sports involving sprinting, cutting, and kicking. A systematic review of 13 studies covering more than 3,800 soccer players and 2 million hours of sport exposure found an incidence of roughly 0.3 to 1.9 injuries per 1,000 exposure hours in men and 0.3 to 0.5 in women, with hamstring injuries accounting for 5–15% of all soccer injuries overall (Diemer et al., Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 2021). In elite men's football specifically, hamstring injuries have become steadily more common over the past two decades.

What the evidence shows: The UEFA Elite Club Injury Study followed 3,909 players from 54 European clubs across 21 consecutive seasons (2001/02–2021/22) and recorded 2,636 hamstring injuries. Hamstring injuries rose from 12% of all injuries in the first season studied to 24% in the most recent one, with training-related hamstring injury incidence increasing by roughly 6.7% annually between 2014/15 and 2021/22. The authors note this trend has occurred despite widespread awareness of hamstring-specific prevention programmes, suggesting that rising match and training intensity may be outpacing prevention efforts (Ekstrand et al., British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2023).

A study specifically in Japanese professional football, following 209 players, found an overall hamstring injury incidence of 0.60 per 1,000 player-hours — considerably higher during games (2.30 per 1,000 hours) than in training (0.35 per 1,000 hours), consistent with the pattern seen in other leagues where match-play sprinting is the dominant mechanism (Ogawa et al., Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2025).

Recognised risk factors

How the diagnosis is made

Most hamstring strains are diagnosed clinically at the time of injury: a sudden, sharp posterior thigh pain during sprinting or an explosive movement, often described as feeling like being struck or pulled from behind, followed by localized tenderness, swelling, and sometimes visible bruising over the following days. Pain with resisted knee flexion and with passive straight-leg raise (stretching the injured muscle) helps confirm the diagnosis and gives a rough sense of severity.

MRI is not required for every strain, but it is widely used in athletic and higher-grade injuries because of its prognostic value — it identifies which muscle is involved, how much cross-sectional area and length are affected, and critically, whether the central tendon is involved, all of which correlate with expected time to return to sport.

What the evidence shows: The British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC), developed by Pollock and colleagues and now used widely in professional sport, grades hamstring injuries from 0 to 4 based on MRI-measured length and cross-sectional area of edema, with a letter suffix denoting myofascial, musculotendinous, or intratendinous involvement. The system has demonstrated substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement between different radiologists reading the same scans, making it a reliable common language between clinicians for prognosis and rehabilitation planning (Pollock et al., British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014).

What the evidence says about treatment

Nearly all hamstring strains — including most higher-grade partial tears — are managed non-surgically. The early phase follows familiar soft-tissue injury principles: relative rest from aggravating activity, ice and compression in the first 48–72 hours, and pain-guided gentle movement rather than complete immobilization, which is now understood to slow recovery and worsen stiffness.

The more consequential question is what rehabilitation should look like as the injury progresses, because this is where the evidence has shifted meaningfully over the past decade — toward protocols that emphasize lengthening (eccentric) exercise earlier and more deliberately than older, purely strength-and-stretch-based approaches.

What the evidence shows: A randomised controlled trial of 75 Swedish elite sprinters and jumpers with acute hamstring injuries compared a rehabilitation protocol emphasizing progressive agility and trunk-stabilization exercises (the "C-protocol") against one emphasizing progressive lengthening exercises performed at increasing speed and range through eccentric loading (the "L-protocol"). The L-protocol group returned to full participation in training after a median of 28 days, compared with 51 days in the C-protocol group — roughly half the recovery time — without any increase in reinjury (Askling, Tengvar & Thorstensson, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014).

Commonly used rehabilitation components

A more recent systematic review and meta-analysis pooling nine randomised trials of hamstring rehabilitation protocols reaffirmed this pattern: approaches incorporating structured eccentric loading, particularly the L-protocol style of lengthening exercise, were associated with both faster return to sport and lower reinjury rates than more conventional concentric-strengthening or stretching-based programmes.

The reinjury problem

What sets hamstring strains apart from many other soft-tissue injuries is how often they recur — and how quickly. Reported recurrence rates across the literature range widely, from roughly 4% to 68% depending on the population and how "reinjury" is defined, but a consistent finding across multiple large cohorts is that most recurrences happen within the first one to two months of returning to play, and that a substantial majority occur in the same muscle, often at the same site, as the original injury.

What the evidence shows: Data from the Japanese professional football cohort found that a prior hamstring injury was itself the clearest identifiable risk factor for a subsequent one, echoing findings from European cohorts. The authors emphasize that structured, strength-verified rehabilitation — rather than a fixed calendar timeline — should guide the decision to return to full training and competition (Ogawa et al., Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 2025).

This is the practical reason clinicians increasingly avoid clearing athletes to return based on pain resolution alone. Persistent deficits in eccentric hamstring strength — even after a player feels essentially normal — appear to be a meaningful driver of early reinjury, which is part of the rationale for structured strength testing, sprint-mechanics assessment, and criteria-based (rather than purely time-based) return-to-sport decisions in higher-level athletic care.

PhaseTypical focusNotes
Acute (days 0–3)Relative rest, ice/compression, pain-guided movementAvoid prolonged immobilization
Early (days 3–10)Pain-free range of motion, light strengtheningProgress guided by symptoms, not the calendar
Progressive loading (weeks 1–4+)Eccentric/lengthening exercise, trunk stability, running progressionTimeline varies substantially with MRI grade
Return-to-sport testingEccentric strength symmetry, sprint mechanics, sport-specific drillsCriteria-based clearance reduces early reinjury risk

When to see a specialist

A same-day evaluation is reasonable for a hamstring injury accompanied by a loud pop, significant swelling and bruising appearing within hours, inability to bear weight, or a palpable gap in the muscle — all of which raise concern for a higher-grade or complete tear that may need more specialised management. For a typical strain, seeking assessment within the first few days is worthwhile if pain and swelling are more significant than expected, or if this is a recurrence of a prior injury in the same leg. A sports medicine physician, orthopaedic surgeon, or sports physiotherapist can grade the injury, set realistic expectations for recovery time, and — perhaps most importantly — help ensure return to sport is based on tested strength and function rather than how the leg happens to feel on a given day.

References (PubMed / Journal)

Diemer WM, Winters M, Tol JL, Pas HIMFL, Moen MH. Incidence of Acute Hamstring Injuries in Soccer: A Systematic Review of 13 Studies Involving More Than 3800 Athletes With 2 Million Sport Exposure Hours. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021;51(1):27-36. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2021.9305

Ekstrand J, Bengtsson H, Waldén M, Davison M, Khan KM, Hägglund M. Hamstring injury rates have increased during recent seasons and now constitute 24% of all injuries in men's professional football: the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study from 2001/02 to 2021/22. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57(5):292-298. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105407

Ogawa T, Funasaki H, Tanaka K, Kubota D, Saito M. Incidence of Hamstring Injury and Analysis of Risk Factors for Reinjury in Japanese Professional Football Players. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/23259671251391776

Pollock N, James SL, Lee JC, Chakraverty R. British athletics muscle injury classification: a new grading system. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(18):1347-1351. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093302

Askling CM, Tengvar M, Thorstensson A. Acute hamstring injuries in Swedish elite sprinters and jumpers: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial comparing two rehabilitation protocols. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(7):532-539. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093214